Andre Agassi, though not as intense a short-time period work effort, has performed just as diligently in his athletic field. He has won title after title, and has actually managed to be one of the longest running tennis champions of all time, competing with tennis icons half his age. His prolonged competitions finally culminated in a major championship match against the great one-hand back-hander, Roger Federer. He did lose that match, but getting there was a feat in itself. Now he is admitting that back in 1997, he failed a drug test because he snorted a single line with a person of bad influence of his life. That person was also fired from his staff soon thereafter.
The point of relaying both of those stories is to say: Who Cares?! How this relates to emerging technology is that recently better drug testing paradigms have been released. What will be caught now? Will a teenage gymnast lose her medal because she rubs lotion on her skin before competition? Will there ever be a method for controlling what substances are considered enabling and which ones are not? It seems to me like the drugs that everyone is making a big deal over are ones that are not enabling, but comically inhibiting (especially meth). Let me hear about drug testing before Mr Universe or a non-Olympic weightlifting/bodybuilding competition. I am sure that that drug test would be a true test of its accuracy and scope.
No comments:
Post a Comment